[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme

From: Kai Großjohann
Subject: Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme
Date: 14 May 2001 12:03:06 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104

On 14 May 2001, Gerd Moellmann wrote:

> My personal opinion is that it would be a mistake to try to replace
> ELisp with a different language; there's just too much ELisp out
> there which breaks even with small changes of semantics.

That's right.  I think the idea of the CLEmacs project by Erik Naggum
was to provide an ELisp emulation layer which automatically takes
effect for *.el files.  And I presume that the Guile-Emacs project had
something similar in mind.

I'm not sure if this is feasible, but Erik suggested it, and I have
great faith in his technical knowledge ;-)

The passive voice should never be used.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]