[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?
Date: 08 Dec 2001 00:43:50 +0900

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Or why don't we take the full step ahead... and make your lexical-binding
> the standard binding for let (and defun).  To bind a variable dynamically,
> it has to be declared via defvar/defcustom or using a new `dlet' form.

Richard has said that he will never accept this.  The _only_ choice we
have is something completely optional.

Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us.  -- Jerry Garcia

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]