[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:44:03 -0500
> Having make-network-process doing something other than making a
> network process is not a more intuitive solution than featurep.
> That is exactly what bothers me about it.
> Perhaps we can implement use of lists as subfeatures. Then
> (featurep 'make-network-process '(:family local)) could be used
> instead of (make-network-process :feature :family 'local).
I still haven't heard any evidence that
(make-network-process foo bar baz)
is not enough and that a separate `featurep' support is required.
Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/19
Re: featurep, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/21
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/21
Re: featurep, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/21
Re: featurep, Kim F. Storm, 2002/03/22
- Re: featurep, (continued)