[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: reducing defface redundancy

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: reducing defface redundancy
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:24:17 -0600 (MDT)

    I replied to Per's question about this in some detail, but here's the
    short version: You can think of the grammar I outlined as merely being a
    convenient shorthand for the defface user; it's not hard to convert it
    into exactly the same `simple but redundant' 2-level format that the UI
    uses now.

I am not convinced that is a good solution to the issue of what
Custom should do.  Suppose I give a face one unconditional attribute,
and suppose the user customizes that attribute with Custom.
Should his customization always be recorded only for the one kind
of screen he is actually using?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]