[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
02 Jul 2002 23:42:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Jon Cast <address@hidden> writes:
>
> We could also call the development snapshots 21.4.50, 21.4.51, etc.
> Even better would be 21.4.50.yyyymmdd, IMO (also, yyyymmdd makes it
> abundantly clear it's a snapshot, even to people who don't understand
> the Linux numbering scheme.)
I like this idea!
But I think we should number snapshots -- including pretests -- as
21.5.0.yyyymmdd
Then the major and minor number for the pretest and snapshots
would be the same as for the actual release.
The current scheme suffers from the problem that the minor
number is off by one...
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Robert J. Chassell, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02