[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64-bit lossage
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: 64-bit lossage |
Date: |
23 Jul 2002 23:09:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
> One runs Debian, very slowly; it's an old 166MHz box without much
> memory.
It probably runs Debian faster than the 48MB P100 I've done most
development on...
> I'll try to get some builds done on them more often, but I'll note one
> thing right off -- the m/alpha.h file breaks the USE_LISP_UNION_TYPE
> code because it unconditionally redefines some of the macros for
> picking apart an integer used as a Lisp_Object.
Yes. Why is that a problem in practice? (Also, lisp.h doesn't always
undef such things before re-defining them, with possible warning
storms as a consequence.)
> I'd say the macros in lisp.h need revising to better support 64-bit
> architectures;
As far as I know, they currently work, but there are probably more
serious 64-bit problems elsewhere unless someone has re-done what
eggert and I both started on.
Adding long long support (per TODO) seems most useful in that area.
- Re: 64-bit lossage, (continued)
Re: 64-bit lossage, Dave Love, 2002/07/17
- Re: 64-bit lossage, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/17
- Re: 64-bit lossage, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/18
- Re: 64-bit lossage, Ken Raeburn, 2002/07/18
- Re: 64-bit lossage, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/19
- Re: 64-bit lossage, Ken Raeburn, 2002/07/20
Re: 64-bit lossage,
Dave Love <=
Re: 64-bit lossage, Ken Raeburn, 2002/07/24
Re: 64-bit lossage, Dave Love, 2002/07/29
Re: 64-bit lossage, Ken Raeburn, 2002/07/21