[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:48:11 +0300 |
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Tak Ota <address@hidden>
> >
> > In other words, the mere fact of cygwin.dll's existence does not
> > necessarily mean that this Emacs is a Cygwin binary.
>
> You are right. For that purpose I think `system-type' should provide
> appropriate distinction between the two.
Yes, that would be my recommendation as well.
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, (continued)
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/08
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/09
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Tak Ota, 2002/08/08
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/11
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Tak Ota, 2002/08/12
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/09