[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:23:17 +0300 (IDT) |
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, John Wiegley wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue Aug 6, Eli writes:
>
> > On 7 Aug 2002, John Paul Wallington wrote:
> >> Maybe `eshell-under-cygwin-p' should be called something else?
>
> > What difference in behavior is that test supposed to handle?
> > Perhaps there's a cleaner way of taking care of that problem.
>
> I think he wants a function that means "DOS-ish behavior for certain
> things".
Sure, but I'd like to know the gory details. Sometimes you can eat the
cake and have it, too.
- `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/06
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/06
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/08
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/09
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Tak Ota, 2002/08/08
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/11
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Tak Ota, 2002/08/12
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/13
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/09