[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs]
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs] |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 17:55:20 -0500 |
>
> > In newer versions of groff there is an option `-c' for nroff to
> > not use SGR. This is not yet supported in Emacs. But for this
> > particular problem it doesn't help since Emacs uses the `man'
> > program for formatting man pages.
> >
> > Should the `man' program pass `-c' to nroff?
>
> I don't think so. Making Emacs understand SGR is much better.
I agree, but I also think that if TERM refers to a terminal that
does not understand SGR, then man or groff should notice it
and make sure that SGR codes are not generated.
Stefan
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/04
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/04
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/05
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Richard Stallman, 2002/12/06
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/06
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs],
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/07
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Alex Schroeder, 2002/12/07
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Richard Stallman, 2002/12/08
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/11
Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Richard Stallman, 2002/12/06