[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs]
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs] |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:58:28 +0100 (CET) |
> > > Should the `man' program pass `-c' to nroff?
> >
> > I don't think so. Making Emacs understand SGR is much better.
>
> I agree, but I also think that if TERM refers to a terminal that
> does not understand SGR, then man or groff should notice it
> and make sure that SGR codes are not generated.
groff is as dumb as TeX. It knows nothing about TERM. I won't change
that.
Werner
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/04
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/04
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/05
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Richard Stallman, 2002/12/06
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/06
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/06
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs],
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Alex Schroeder, 2002/12/07
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Richard Stallman, 2002/12/08
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Werner LEMBERG, 2002/12/11
Re: address@hidden: groff version 1.18.1 and emacs], Richard Stallman, 2002/12/06