[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: info |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:39:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> I believe this arebitrary predictability is not very useful, except in
> those cases where the text between the two *'s is short. As other
> examples in this thread show, sometimes this approach is simply wrong.
First of all, if point is on a menu line, then choose that menu
item. That much we all agree on.
Further, if point is on a line starting with whitespace and
containing some non-whitespace text, this could be a continuation
line for a menu line.
Here's an algorithm:
IF point is on a menu line
THEN
choose that menu item
ELSE
IF point is on a line that starts with whitespace and contains
non-whitespace characters
THEN
WHILE point is on a nonblank line starting with whitespace
DO
move up one line
END
IF point is on a menu line
THEN
choose that menu item
FI
FI
FI
What do people think?
--
Ambibibentists unite!
- Re: info, (continued)
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
Re: info, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/29
Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: info,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
Re: info, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/29