Re: ?\_ patch

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> I now lean toward the original solution of using ?\s.

I've just found that (eq 's '\s) => t.

But, as (eq 'e '\e) is also t, this is not a problem,
perhaps.

> Alternatives like using 32,  ?\040 or  ?\x20 do not look attractive.

To me the last two are attractive because we only have to
change a manual to promote them instead of "? " or "?\ ". :-)

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden