[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ?\_ patch

From: Kim F. Storm
Subject: Re: ?\_ patch
Date: 13 Feb 2003 15:19:53 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     Ok.  So I assume that you want ?XY to be invalid syntax
>     unless Y is <= 040 or one of  " ' ; ( ) [ ] ? or #
> That is the idea.  I can see how someone could have written (?a(b))
> and think it legitimate, but a person could hardly argue that (?ab)
> instead of (?a b) is legitimate.
> It's possible there is some other syntax char I have forgotten
> that should be legitimate there too.  If you can think of one,
> please add it.

I have installed the changes.

Edward O'Connor suggested to modify checkdoc to look for ?\ at the end
of lines and replace them with the new syntax.  That's a good idea,
but I have not done this.

Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]