[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
Date: |
07 Feb 2003 15:17:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I really don't like the wierd double identity of ?\s, but I'm not sure
> > what alternative there is... Perhaps kim's idea (?\SPC), but with a less
> > ambiguous syntax, e.g., #\SPC or something.
>
> Ah! I completely forgot about `#' syntax. I think it's a
> good idea.
I don't object to it, but I think it is unnecessary.
Why add a whole new syntax just because we need ?\s which can be added
with no hazzle at all?
>
> Currently single-key-description produces these: TAB, RET,
> ESC, SPC, DEL. Allowing the corresponding #\TAB, #\RET,
> #\ESC, #\SPC, #\DEL seems nifty.
If everyone else agrees this is a good idea, I'd suggest
using #?SPC, #?TAB, etc.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: ?\_ patch, (continued)
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/08