[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:22:27 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:36:45 +0200
>
> I'm guessing that the long delay will be in the call to
> accept-process-output, and that this delay will be shorter in XEmacs
> than in Emacs.
>
> If that's really the case, then, indeed, it's the subprocess and
> network I/O operations that need to be tweaked.
Since the OP reports that both Cygwin and native Windows builds of
XEmacs are similarly speedy, it sounds improbable that subprocess I/O
is involved.
But that's a speculation; some digging is needed here.
> Hm. I browsed the C source but didn't see anything there that's
> obviously specific to Windows.
Perhaps src/w32proc.c will help to see that ;-)
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, (continued)
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22