[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2003 10:56:00 -0500 (CDT) |
J. Marant wrote:
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> a écrit :
> Actually, not putting the unwanted character in the kill ring might be
> an extra argument for providing `zap-up-to-char', but I personally do
> not use zap-to-char sufficiently often to have strong opinions on the
> issue.
Why would we want to put the unwanted character in
the kill ring?
I meant that I have no strong opinions on whether zap-up-to-char
should be provided. If it is provided then the non-killed character
should obviously not be put in the kill ring.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, (continued)
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Ehud Karni, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Jérôme Marant, 2003/05/21
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Jérôme Marant, 2003/05/22
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour,
Luc Teirlinck <=