[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch |
Date: |
Wed, 05 May 2004 16:20:35 -0400 |
+/* Alist of face mappings. Each element is either of the form
+ (FACE . NEW-FACE), or (FACE NEW-FACE MERGE-FACE...),
Specifying just NEW-FACE is a special case of specifying a list of
faces. So I think it is redundant to have a special way to specify
just one face. It's extra complexity that adds nothing really.
This specification uses the first face in the list, NEW-FACE, last. I
think it should use these faces in the order they appear.
- +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/05
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10