[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp |
Date: |
Sat, 29 May 2004 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST) |
> > I just wonder why I still have to type `RET'. A query-replace
> > action doesn't happen immediately; you still have to press `y',
> > `n', etc. Thus I suggest, if possible, to omit the `RET'.
>
> Surely you don't repeat query-replace commands so often that `M-%
> RET' is significantly harder to type than `M-% M-%'?
Aah, a misunderstanding! I thought that I have to type `M-% M-% RET'.
Of course `M-% RET' is fine. Actually, `M-% M-%' and `M-% RET' could
do the same...
Werner
Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp, Miles Bader, 2004/05/29
Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp, Stefan Daschek, 2004/05/29