[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-h C-i
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: C-h C-i |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:42:37 +0200 |
On 18 Jun 2004 19:19:42 -0500, Karl Fogel <address@hidden> wrote:
> If there were more organization, to make it obvious what the useful
> work is, people would be doing that instead. You want lead a
> network-based development project, but while avoiding technologies
> that require being attached to the network regularly. This
> contradiction is part of the problem. Minor issues will continue to
> dominate, as long as people do not see an organized, trackable
> presentation of high-priority issues, maintained in real time.
I agree to the last dot and comma.
/L/e/k/t/u
- C-h C-i, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/17
- Re: C-h C-i, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/18
- Re: C-h C-i, Karl Fogel, 2004/06/19
- Re: C-h C-i,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: C-h C-i, Miles Bader, 2004/06/19
- Re: C-h C-i, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/06/19
- One possible bug-tracking system., Karl Fogel, 2004/06/20
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Alex Schroeder, 2004/06/20
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Karl Fogel, 2004/06/20
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/06/20
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Karl Fogel, 2004/06/20
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Richard Stallman, 2004/06/21
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Juanma Barranquero, 2004/06/21
- Re: One possible bug-tracking system., Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22