Re: Single process output reading

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     IMO a better way would be to allow restricting accept-process-output to
>     just a single process output reading.  Then the speech output system,
>     aware of possible consequences of advising 'message' etc., could invoke
>     accept-process-output in the restricted form, without the danger of
>     unwanted side effects.
> 
> I think it would be reasonable to provide a way to tell
> wait_reading_process_output to ignore certain processes and read from
> certain other processes.  I worry about the idea of not running timers,
> though, and that seems unnecessary for what you need.  I think it
> would be better to implement the feature so that timers do run.
> 
> I think it would be better to clean up the calling conventions
> of wait_reading_process_output rather than try to squeeze everything
> into the existing argumemts.

I can do that.

Should I rename wait_reading_process_input to wait_reading_process_output ?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk