[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:57:46 -0400 |
My "lightweight" implementation is currently ~20KB (organized in 6
files) plus ~16KB of new code for mail-utils.el file.
I'm perfectly fine with the idea to put those 20KB in one file (let's
call it lisp/mail/mime.el)
Yes, let's do that.
> I cannot follow this part. If we are replacing and eliminating the
> code in lisp/gnus/rfc*.el, why talk about patching those files?
You're right, that sounds suboptimal. However, I'm afraid that Gnus
people will not like the idea of adapting Gnus to a new code and I
don't want to force them to do this.
Sorry, what does this refer to? Force them to do what?
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, (continued)
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/11
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/08
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/08
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/10
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/10
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/11
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/11
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Alexander Pohoyda, 2004/10/12
- Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/13