[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch for documentation about version control
From: |
Andre Spiegel |
Subject: |
Re: patch for documentation about version control |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:30:08 +0100 |
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 16:34 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I'd also suggest we don't recommend RCS any more.
I've rewritten the Introduction on Version Systems now, drawing from the
various suggestions. It recommends CVS, GNU Arch, and RCS now, in that
order, and notes that RCS is useful for single files, while the others
are what you should consider for a full project.
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, (continued)
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Andre Spiegel, 2004/11/10
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/11/10
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Andre Spiegel, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Stefan, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Andre Spiegel, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Andre Spiegel, 2004/11/11
- Re: patch for documentation about version control, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/11/12
- Re: patch for documentation about version control,
Andre Spiegel <=