Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming

[Lennart Borgman]

Miles Bader wrote:

> 2005/11/14, David Reitter <address@hidden>:
>  
>
> > It's the concept that counts, and none of the merit is taken away
> > from Emacs if the term denotating the concept changes.
> >    
>
> No of course not.  But the name shortcuts is misleading, a bit ugly,
> and annoying for Emacs veterans (because it drops a familar term for
> something that's not particularly nice); morever it hasn't been shown
> to be so newbie unfriendly as to warrant _that_ much concern
>  
It is the sum of all newbie unfriendliness that counts. At least for the 
newbie.