[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RMAIL: mbox code status ?

From: Xavier Maillard
Subject: Re: RMAIL: mbox code status ?
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:13 +0100
User-agent: RMAIL/GNU Emacs

   Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:21:17 +0200
   From: prestowk <address@hidden>

   What are the main reasons for switching from Babyl to mbox format in
   Rmail?  Are there technical or conceptual problems with the Babyl
   format, or is it just a case of wanting compatibility with a more
   widely used format?

I can see two main reasons:

1. The format as you said
2. Procmail splitting (and anti-spam countermeasures)

Not to forget that, as someone told me, Emacs can only deal with 128Mb

Here are my reasons to use this branch.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]