[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL: mbox code status ?
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL: mbox code status ? |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
RMAIL/GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 |
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:21:17 +0200
From: prestowk <address@hidden>
What are the main reasons for switching from Babyl to mbox format in
Rmail? Are there technical or conceptual problems with the Babyl
format, or is it just a case of wanting compatibility with a more
widely used format?
I can see two main reasons:
1. The format as you said
2. Procmail splitting (and anti-spam countermeasures)
Not to forget that, as someone told me, Emacs can only deal with 128Mb
file.
Here are my reasons to use this branch.
Xavier