[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: better "pr" with gdb-6.4

From: Kim F. Storm
Subject: Re: better "pr" with gdb-6.4
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:51:41 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:

> Sorry I wasn't clear.  They're meant as alternatives.

Ok, but I would like ppargs to print a short form like this:
(load "..." t t t)

>  > Actually, it would alse be useful if you could enhance
>  > xbacktrace to recognize when the current frame is Ffuncall and
>  > print the args at that level  (maybe for other functions too).
> But only some of the lisp backtrace appears as calls to Ffuncall (the
> primitives?).  In the example that I gave, the lisp backtrace has two
> levels:
> Lisp Backtrace:
> "load"
> "normal-top-level"
> but the C backtrace has only one call to Ffuncall (for load):

Is it possible to write a macro that would traverse up the C stack and do
something sensible for "known functions" like Ffuncall and Feval.

Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]