[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: risky local variable mechanism

From: Jonathan Yavner
Subject: re: risky local variable mechanism
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:13:13 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

(re: mechanism proposed by Chong Yidong)

unsafep.el (used by SES) calls risky-local-variable-p with NIL as the 
second argument, because it doesn't know yet what value will be 
assigned.  Please maintain the feature that NIL as second argument to 
risky-local-variable-p means "There exists at least one risky value 
that could be assigned to this variable."

I'm not sure if your patch does this.  Sorry for my poor patch-reading 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]