[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:05:13 -0500 |
The relevant part is the function `unsafep-variable', which can be
adapted easily. The other things that unsafep.el checks are not
related to file variables.
That seems wrong, because it refers to `val' which does not exist in
the function unsafep-variable. However, beyond that, it is not
clearly right for unsafep to reject binding all variables that would
be rejected in a local variables list, given that unsafep can detect
giving functions as values.
- Re: safe-local-variable additions, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/02/02
- re: risky local variable mechanism, Jonathan Yavner, 2006/02/10
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/11
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Jonathan Yavner, 2006/02/11
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/11
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/12
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/12
- Re: risky local variable mechanism,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/11
- Re: risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/12