[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: address@hidden: RE: file-cache doc should state thatthecache is non-
RE: address@hidden: RE: file-cache doc should state thatthecache is non-persistent]
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:03:28 -0800
> Btw, should we merge the "File Name Cache" section with
> the following one, "File Convenience"? They are both short,
> and the file cache is certainly a convenience feature of the
> kind described in the latter section.
> No, I don't think that's a very good idea. File Name Cache is
> a reasonable, self-contained topic. File Convenience is, currently,
> a grab-bag or catch-all.
There's nothing wrong with a grab-bag section describing a feature
that has several commands.
I didn't say there was anything wrong with that (though that node could
benefit from a bit more structure (e.g. bullets), as it is essentially a
What I said was that File Name Cache is a self-contained topic. I see no
reason to toss it into the grab bag, but the grab-bag list could (should)
include a link to File Name Cache.
Just one opinion.