[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-Xtra
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-Xtra |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:55 -0400 |
3) Have those ``extra'' sections be part of the on-line manual, but
not of the printed manual. In the printed manual, replace the
extra sections with an xref to the extra manual. The Texinfo
@ifinfo facility should do the trick.
This should be a good solution to the original problem, which is that
the FSF wants the printed manuals it sells to not be too large.
This might be a good approach, as a replacement for emacs-xtra.
If we do not find a good way to split the manual in two, we could
do this instead.
Would someone like to work on this and verify that it really works?
- Re: emacs doc changes, (continued)
- Re: emacs doc changes, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/25
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/13