[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs doc changes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs doc changes |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:15:45 +0300 |
> Cc: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:57:32 +0200
>
> Is there a reason not to use unified diffs ("diff -u") when available?
AFAIK, only one: that Richard asks for "diff -c".
- Re: emacs doc changes, (continued)
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/30
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Jay Belanger, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/25
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/13