[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comint-accumulate-marker
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: comint-accumulate-marker |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:45:42 +1200 |
> C-c C-j would be "jump", not particularly to the end. Other options
> would be C-c C-l (recenter/normalize) or C-c > (to end of input).
C-c C-l isn't an option because comint-dynamic-list-input-ring is already bound
to it. JD has already removed this binding anyway, lets move forward.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, (continued)
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/18
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, JD Smith, 2006/04/18
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/18
- Message not available
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/18
- Message not available
- Bug in diff-mode? (was: Re: comint-accumulate-marker), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/18
- Re: Bug in diff-mode? (was: Re: comint-accumulate-marker), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/19
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/19
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, David Kastrup, 2006/04/20
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, JD Smith, 2006/04/20
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/04/18
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, JD Smith, 2006/04/18
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, Miles Bader, 2006/04/18
- Re: comint-accumulate-marker, JD Smith, 2006/04/18