[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

From: Ken Raeburn
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:04:19 -0400

On Apr 27, 2006, at 18:38, David Kastrup wrote:
Not necessarily.  Most filenames are written to accommodate 8+3. so if
we have 12345678.el\0, this is twelve bytes.  The same with .elc might
require sixteen bytes after alignment.

I don't think that should be varying between compilers though. Unless the x86_64 ABI (implementation) isn't stable yet, which would be bad news...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]