[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs.texi
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs.texi |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:17:35 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden (Karl Berry), address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:46:32 +0200
>
> But if there is only one place where this matters, and there is another
> way to write it already, let's do that and get on with the pretest.
Whoever said anything about holding the pretest because of this minor
issue?
- Re: emacs.texi, (continued)
- Re: emacs.texi, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/08
- Re: emacs.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/07
- Re: emacs.texi, Johan Bockgård, 2006/10/09
- Re: emacs.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/09
- Re: emacs.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/09
- Re: emacs.texi, Karl Berry, 2006/10/09
- Re: emacs.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/10
- Re: emacs.texi, David Kastrup, 2006/10/10
- Re: emacs.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/10
- Re: emacs.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/10
- Re: emacs.texi,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: emacs.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/10
- Re: emacs.texi, Karl Berry, 2006/10/10
Re: emacs.texi, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/06