[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Thomas Koenig |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:38:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:22:22PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > That's the way gcc and gfortran maintenance works. In practice,
> > it works pretty well.
> Well for whom, exactly?
For gcc and gfortran development.
If you have an active interest in that matter, please feel free to
contribute to resolving PR 29689.
Thomas
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Thomas Koenig, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Thomas Koenig <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/03
- Re: Re: Emacs and GFortran, François-Xavier Coudert, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steven Bosscher, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Brooks Moses, 2006/11/02