Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time

[martin rudalics]

> > But stealth mode does not guarantee that at all.  It is completely
> > irreproducible whether or not some buffer has been completely
> > stealthified.
>
>
> Agree!
>
> I actually think Martin's argument speaks _against_ a non-nil default
> value of jit-lock-stealth-time -- no major mode should ever rely on
> such convoluted behavior.

Obviously.  But we should be prepared to get a few more bug reports when we
set this to nil.