[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:43:47 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:39:15 -0500
>
> > The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving to
> > another part of the file. Is fontification now sufficiently fast
> > that such delays are not much of an annoyance any more?
>
> No, we are definitely not there yet, IMO.
>
> Would you please tell us more? What sort of machine are you using,
> and how bad are these delays? We need to compare them with the delays
> caused by stealth fontification.
I was talking from memory. I will make some measurements in a few
days and tell the results.
- Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, martin rudalics, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26