[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:37:31 -0500 |
> The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving
> to another part of the file.
That is the motive for jit-font-lock, but stealth fontification
fontifies _other_ buffers.
The reason is still to avoid the need to fontify
when you move to a part of one of those other buffers
that hadn't been displayed in this session.
The question is, is the time saved by that enough to be worth caring
about?
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, (continued)
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25