[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:25:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
> On Windows, to bind a non-ASCII character with some modifier
> to a command, you must specify a raw byte code. For
> instance, if you want to bind meta-a-grave to a command:
> (global-set-key [?\M-\340] ...)
> That is for the case of Latin-1 environment where the byte
> code of a-grave is \340.
That sounds right, except I'd add a "currently" somewhere in there.
Stefan
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/28
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/28
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29