[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

From: Davis Herring
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el3.2lanl

> It seems easier, but in fact to DTRT according to the documentation
> above means dropping support for Windows 95, 98 and ME, and modifying
> ALL system messages to use Unicode, which is major work. I think it is
> worth doing that for Emacs 22, because Windows 98 and ME are almost dead
> now, and probably will be by the time Emacs 22 s released, and also with
> the change of Emacs' internal representation, Unicode fits better. But
> now I think the best approach for this problem is to add an entry to
> PROBLEMS and get on with the release.

Just to be certain:
Surely you mean 23 instead of 22, especially with the mention of Unicode?


This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]