[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Merging multitty

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Merging multitty
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:01:16 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux)

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> I disagree with that assessment.  It presumes that not making Emacs
>> multitty-capable ever is a reasonable option.
> It is the only option if we don't have anyone willing to maintain
> that capability. But judging from your activism on this, I don't
> expect we will have that problem.

My "activism" does not make me a Windows, DOS, or MacOSX developer, so
it would not carry the day.  While I don't remember a "horribly
broken" assessment either, it does not seem like I have the most
reliable of recollections about the details of the discussion.

I think it is more or less safe to say that it is about time to have
multitty moved into at least a branch in Emacs-CVS since development
in its own repository has IIRC been reduced mostly to synches, anyway.
Since its current version control system is arch-based, it sounds like
the way through the arch-variant of Emacs CVS that Miles proposed
would likely be the best way to do this: the person doing the move
would then work with a system he is familiar with on both ends.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]