[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 08:51:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) |
dhruva <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/21/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Where is the problem with that? Allow for fallback sites to be
>> specified. The fallback may well end in a central repository, and if
>> you are lucky, the package drawn from there will have been updated to
>> know where to get more recent packages in future.
>
> Something along the lines of Debian's "apt". It is such a wonderful
> tool.
Again: I don't want to go the way of the central repository. 95% of
what constitutes Debian is maintaining the central repository. We
don't have those resources.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: CVS is the `released version', (continued)
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Xavier Maillard, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', dhruva, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version',
David Kastrup <=
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/24
- package.el (was: Re: CVS is the `released version'), David Reitter, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, David Reitter, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21