[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS is the `released version'

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: CVS is the `released version'
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:51:46 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux)

dhruva <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
> On 5/21/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Where is the problem with that?  Allow for fallback sites to be
>> specified.  The fallback may well end in a central repository, and if
>> you are lucky, the package drawn from there will have been updated to
>> know where to get more recent packages in future.
> Something along the lines of Debian's "apt". It is such a wonderful
> tool.

Again: I don't want to go the way of the central repository.  95% of
what constitutes Debian is maintaining the central repository.  We
don't have those resources.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]