[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package.el
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: package.el |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 20:13:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> David> *scratch* is not guaranteed to be in emacs-lisp-mode. So C-j might
> David> not work. M-x eval-region would!
>
> I wasn't aware of this. Is this a common situation? Those
> instructions are intended for people who know very little about
> Emacs; are they likely to have changed the mode for *scratch*?
Primarily people with little knowledge about Emacs would be tempted to
change the mode for *scratch*... On the other hand, they would be
likely to do a lot of other things one can't possibly guess in
advance.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: CVS is the `released version', (continued)
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/24
- package.el (was: Re: CVS is the `released version'), David Reitter, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: package.el, David Reitter, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Davis Herring, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/25
- Re: package.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el, David Reitter, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/05/21