[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:55:46 -0500 |
So perhaps you hack all day, periodically making commits (using "git
commit") which store your changes into the .git subdir. Then when you
later connect to the net, you can merge the new changes in .git into the
remote emacs repository on savannah (using "git push").
It sounds like "git push" is the real analogue of CVS commit,
and that this is the closest match-up between the concepts of git
and the concepts of CVS:
CVS GIT
save file = commit
commit = pull or push
But I still don't understand what step actually alters the trunk that
users will get by default from the public repository. Does `push' do
that? If not `push', then what?
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tassilo Horn, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/03
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, 2008/01/04
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/04
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, tomas, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/03
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/05
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/05
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/05
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2008/01/05
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/05
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06