[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP |
|
Date: |
Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:34:34 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 13:14:17 +0000
> From: Jason Rumney <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Eric Lilja wrote:
> > I'm also wondering what --enable-font-backend does on windows...
>
> It does the same as other platforms. It enables the new font backend
> which better handles unicode fonts.
Do we need to fix the build without it (which currently fails on
Windows), or should we make --enable-font-backend the default?
- Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Zhang Wei, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Kenichi Handa, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Miles Bader, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/05
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/02/06
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Zhang Wei, 2008/02/02
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02