[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:09:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Marshall, Simon" <address@hidden> writes:
>> I don't see how your argument maps to support this as the most
>> convenient setting. Which is pretty much what this is supposed to be
>> about.
>
> But I am curious in understanding how, if you are interested in
> compilation output and/or compilation progress, you interact with the
> new *compilation* behaviour. Do you always scroll through the
> compilation output?
If I am looking for something, sure.
> All 20 pages of it, to use your example? If you do not, I presume you
> are not interested in the output. In which case, the default value
> does not matter for you. If you do, why do you prefer that Emacs does
> not do almost all of the scrolling for you?
Because Emacs' speed of scrolling does not agree with my speed of reading.
--
David Kastrup
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, (continued)
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Miles Bader, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, David Kastrup, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, David Kastrup, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*,
David Kastrup <=
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/08
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/08