[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New custom faces for rmail.el
From: |
Bastien Guerry |
Subject: |
Re: New custom faces for rmail.el |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:24:26 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> But AFAICS there are many places where we have both mistakes: 1) have a
>> face *and* a variable, and 2) name them with the *-face suffix.
>
> Having a variable is not necessarily an error. In the case of
> font-lock, this was done originally so as to allow font-lock faces to be
> changed on a per-buffer basis (by making the variable buffer-local and
> making it point to different faces). Until Miles installs his changes
> that add the ability to change faces on a per-buffer basis, this is
> still useful.
>
> As for the -face name, this is historical and should probably be
> changed, tho when we changed the others we specifically avoided changing
> the font-lock ones.
Thanks for the clarification.
--
Bastien
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, (continued)
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/12
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Bastien Guerry, 2008/02/12
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Miles Bader, 2008/02/12
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Bastien Guerry, 2008/02/12
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/12
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Andreas Schwab, 2008/02/13
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/13
- OT: A non-text attachment was scrubbed... (was: New custom faces for rmail.el), Reiner Steib, 2008/02/13
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Bastien Guerry, 2008/02/13
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/12
- Re: New custom faces for rmail.el,
Bastien Guerry <=