[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug trackers

From: Don Armstrong
Subject: Re: Bug trackers
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:49:54 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Richard Stallman wrote:
>     Debbugs currently is based on the assumption that every bug is
>     assigned to at least one package. In terms of a distribution, this
>     makes perfect sense, but it's different for applications. When you're
>     developing a single application like emacs, I'd imagine you'd separate
>     bugs into "components" or similar of the application, like "gtk
>     interface", "documentation", or "elisp" (as examples; you all'd come
>     up with better ones.)
> Is it possible for all bugs to be initially assigned to "emacs"
> and for maintainers to move them subsequently into other categories?

Yes, we can assign bugs to emacs if there isn't a valid package or
even if the submit mail wasn't able to be parsed.

Don Armstrong

I'd sign up in a hot second for any cellular company whose motto was:
"We're less horrible than a root canal with a cold chisel."
 -- Cory Doctorow

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]