[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lexbind

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: lexbind
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:04:38 +0900

paul r writes:

 > In the spirit of the (lexical-let ...), a possible improvement could
 > be to have a (lexical-defun ...),

What improvement is this over

    (require 'cl-macs)
    (flet ((...)))

I guess it requires two less levels of parentheses, and one less level
of indentation.  Anything else?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]