[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lexbind

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: lexbind
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:18:58 +0900

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>     > I am not sure `defvar' is enough.  The reason is that using it to fix
>     > existing packages may require renaming.
>     Yes, it may require renaming.  It's usually not a big deal, tho.
> I think we would be better off also having other mechanisms
> for doing this, which do not require renaming.

Could you give a concrete example of what you're talking about?


Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]