Re: Fly-spelling with multiple dictionaries

[Sascha Wilde]

martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:

>> FWIW: have a look at http://www.finseth.com/emacs.html
>> Not every of the more than 100 mentioned implementation will fully
>> qualify as "yet another Emacs implementation", but be assured there are
>> more than four...
>
> ... as an earlier user of EINE I am assured.

So no need to tell you about Emacs history, eh?  ;-)

It seems I got your original point wrong: I thought you were talking
about the doubled and tripled afford of having different implementations
of basically the same application. 

Anyway, regarding the issue of hunspell: there is already a
ispell/aspell like command line interface included with hunspell
(including even tex, roff, sgml support).  I had only a very short look
at it so I can't say how big the differences actually are, but I'm quite
confident that it will not take too much afford to integrate it with
Emacs just the way it has been done for ispell and aspell.

cheers
sascha
-- 
Sascha Wilde

A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking.